US Government Sues Adobe, Maker of Photoshop, Over Hidden Fees and Subscription Traps

By: Alex Trent | Published: Jun 18, 2024

The US government is taking Adobe, the makers of the popular editing software “Photoshop,” to court over accusations the company has been “trapping” customers into long-term subscription plans and concealing fees from these customers.

The lawsuit was brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and alleges that some of the fees hidden in fine print can cost someone hundreds of dollars.

FTC Lawsuit

On Monday, the FTC wrote a press release announcing the lawsuit and the accusations against Adobe.

A close-up of a judge holding a wooden gavel on a wooden surface.


“The Federal Trade Commission is taking action against software maker Adobe and two of its executives, Maninder Sawhney and David Wadhwani, for deceiving consumers by hiding the early termination fee for its most popular subscription plan and making it difficult for consumers to cancel their subscriptions,” said the press release.


Trapped Customers

Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, accused Adobe of “trapping” customers into long-term subscriptions through hidden termination fees and other barriers to cancellation.

A pair of handcuffs sitting around a stack of bills.

Source: Bermix Studio/Unsplash

“Adobe trapped customers into year-long subscriptions through hidden early termination fees and numerous cancellation hurdles,” said Levine. “Americans are tired of companies hiding the ball during subscription signup and then putting up roadblocks when they try to cancel. The FTC will continue working to protect Americans from these illegal business practices.”

History of Subscription Model

According to the FTC, Adobe changed its business plan in 2012 to prominently focus on its subscription model. This model forced customers to continually pay a recurring fee to access and use its popular software.

A computer setup featuring logos for different Adobe software.

Source: Emily Bernal/Unsplash

“Subscriptions account for most of the company’s revenue,” said the FTC statement.

Annual Paid Monthly

One of the thrusts of the lawsuit complaint is the company’s “annual paid monthly” subscription plan that is pre-selected by default and “buries” an early termination fee of 50 percent of the remaining monthly payments if a person decides to cancel.

Close-up of a person's hands as they count a stack of US dollar bills. The person is wearing a dark blue shirt, and their fingernails are painted in a light color

Source: Alexander Grey/Unsplash

With an “annual paid monthly” subscription, a customer is committed to paying a larger sum over a year compared to just a month-by-month subscription in exchange for getting a discounted rate. The other two subscription options Adobe offers are called “Monthly” and “Annual Prepaid.”

Unlawful Enrollment Practices

The lawsuit also accuses Adobe of being engaged in unlawful practices to get customers into an “enrollment flow.”

A logo for the Adobe software product "Photoshop."

Source: Rubatiul Azad/Unsplash

“For many products and services, Adobe offers free trials in addition to no-trial (or “buy now”) subscriptions. Adobe automatically converts consumers who select the APM plan during a free trial enrollment to paid subscribers if they do not cancel their subscriptions before the trial period ends. Consumers who start with a “buy now” APM subscription, rather than a free trial, encounter substantially the same enrollment flow, except the “buy now” subscription flows do not contain text relating to a free trial,” the lawsuit complaint says.


Khan’s Comments

Lina Khan, the chair of the Federal Trade Commission, released a post thread on the social media platform X on Monday breaking down the accusations against Adobe and issuing a stern warning.

The chair of the FTC Lina Khan in an official photograph.

Source: Public Domain/Wikimedia

“Because two senior executives were involved in overseeing, directing, controlling, or participating in Adobe’s illegal business practices, they are named in the complaint. @FTC won’t hesitate to hold individual executives accountable for violating the law,” wrote Khan.


Adobe’s Response

The company has responded to the accusations leveled against them by the FTC and looks forward to fighting these claims in court.

A computer screen showing Adobe Illustrator.

Source: iyus sugiharto/Unsplash

“We are transparent with the terms and conditions of our subscription agreements and have a simple cancellation process,” said Dana Rao, Adobe’s general counsel and chief trust officer. 


Convenient and Flexible

Roa fought back against the narrative from the FTC that the cancellation process was overburdening its customers. In his statement, Road extolled the virtues of a subscription-based service model.

Many people sitting down at tables in a coffee shop in Jacksonville, Florida.

Source: Wade Austin Ellis/Unsplash

“Subscription services are convenient, flexible and cost-effective to allow users to choose the plan that best fits their needs, timeline and budget,” Rao said in the Adobe company statement.“We will refute the FTC’s claims in court.”


FTC Rule Changes

This lawsuit against Adobe followed rule change proposals made by the FTC last year meant to address this issue in the industry.

The building for the FTC located in Washington D.C.

Source: Carol M. Highsmith/Wikimedia

“Some businesses too often trick consumers into paying for subscriptions they no longer want or didn’t sign up for in the first place,” said Khan last year. “The proposed rule would require that companies make it as easy to cancel a subscription as it is to sign up for one. The proposal would save consumers time and money, and businesses that continued to use subscription tricks and traps would be subject to stiff penalties.


Click to Cancel

The FTC has advocated for a “Click to Cancel” model to become the standard for recurring subscriptions and memberships.

A close up shot of a pressable button that says 'STOP.'

Source: Rich Smith/Unsplash

“If consumers are unable to easily leave any program when they want to, the negative option feature becomes nothing more than a way to continue charging them for products they no longer want. To address this issue, the proposed rule would require businesses to make it at least as easy to cancel a subscription as it was to start it. For example, if you can sign up online, you must be able to cancel on the same website, in the same number of steps,” said the FTC last March.


Civil Trial

This FTC lawsuit, filed in conjunction with the Civil Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, demands a jury trial in the United States District Court of the Northern District of California.

A court gavel seen in contrast lighting on a marble surface.

Source: Wesley Tingey/Unsplash

The complaint asks for a “permanent injunction, monetary judgment, civil penalty judgment, and other relief.” This prayer for relief involves asking the court to impose civil penalties on the defendants along with any monetary awards that the Court can grant.