Spotify CEO Surprised At Missing Company Targets After Laying Off 1,500 Employees

By: Alex Trent | Published: May 23, 2024

In December, Spotify implemented its largest number of layoffs to date, letting go of 1,500 workers in what was celebrated at the time as a new age of efficiency by CEO Daniel Ek.

However, on an investor’s call in April following Q1 earnings, Ek blamed Spotify’s missing of certain targets on staff operational difficulties among other issues.

Earnings Call

On the earnings call, Ek celebrated strong revenue growth and having “the largest operating income we’ve ever posted.”

Advertisement
A logo for Spotify seen on a person's cellphone.

Source: Haithem Ferdi/Unsplash

However, Ek also acknowledged that the company missed monthly active user growth targets for the quarter, blaming “a bit of a slowdown at the start of the year.”

Advertisement

Workforce Challenge

Ek outlined three main factors that led to disappointing growth numbers, one of them being related to the previously touted workforce reduction.

Advertisement
Three office workers at a table with paperwork in front of them.

Source: fauxels/Pexels

“Another significant challenge was the impact of our December workforce reduction. Although there’s no question that it was the right strategic decision, it did disrupt our day-to-day operations more than we anticipate,” Ek said.

Big Year

Another factor that Ek mentioned is the massive growth the company experienced in 2023, though didn’t say whether this factor had more of an impact than the workforce reduction.

Advertisement
The logo for Spotify.

Source: Alexander Shatov/Unsplash

“The MAU and subscription growth we achieved in 2023 not only surpassed our most ambitious forecast, but also set a record for the most significant user growth in Spotify’s history…2023 was a truly standout year and should not be a based on expectation for every subsequent year,” said Ek.

Efficient Workforce

In December, Spotify laid off around 1,500 workers, or an equivalent of 17% of its workforce in an effort to aggressively push for profitability. At the time Ek expressed his concern about people “working around work.”

Advertisement
A brightly lit modern office space with exposed ceiling and yellow accent lighting. Employees are engaged in their work at clustered desks with blue chairs and computers. Some employees are seated and conversing at a communal table, while others are walking through the office

Source: SustainableTall/X

“We still have too many people dedicated to supporting work and even doing work around the work, rather than contributing to opportunities with real impact,” Ek said in a memo announcement of the workforce cuts.

Surprisingly Large Layoffs

In the memo, Ek tried to reassure workers who may be questioning the layoffs despite such a successful year.

Woman walking away from her office with a cardboard box full of her belongings after being fired

Source: Freepik

“I realize that for many, a reduction of this size will feel surprisingly large given the recent positive earnings report and our performance. We debated making smaller reductions throughout 2024 and 2025. Yet, considering the gap between our financial goal state and our current operational costs, I decided that a substantial action to rightsize our costs was the best option to accomplish our objectives,” said Ek in December.

Advertisement

Reality of Output

While Ek was proud of the success seen in 2022 and 2023, he saw it as an inefficient success.

Two workers in an office working on computers.

Source: Tim van der Kuip/Unsplash

“When we look back on 2022 and 2023, it has truly been impressive what we have accomplished. But, at the same time, the reality is much of this output was linked to having more resources. By most metrics, we were more productive but less efficient. We need to be both,” Ek said.

Advertisement

Surprise at the Dip

Fast-forward to today and the overwhelmingly positive results achieved seem more mixed compared to the recent Q1.

A Spotify logo looms on a monitor in front of a music player.

Source: Reet Talreja/Unsplash

Fortune writer Ryan Hogg attributed this to “the apparent collective surprise at how that can affect operations in the short run,” saying it “marks a dash of hubris for the newly bullish streaming group.”

Advertisement

Finding Footing

In the earnings call, Ek was hopeful about the company’s ability to navigate the workforce reduction, saying it took some time to adjust to the new normal.

A close-up image showing a person's feet wearing black work boots with a rugged sole, standing on a yellow-painted curb

Source: Shoes For Crews/Facebook

“It took us some time to find our footing, but more than four months into this transition, I think we’re back on track,” Ek said.

Advertisement

Workforce Layoffs

Spotify is one among many tech companies that are trying to experiment with massive layoffs in their industry.

A close-up of a Google search bar.

Source: Christian Wiediger/Unsplash

According to TechCrunch in May, huge companies like Tesla, Amazon, Google, and Microsoft have all conducted sizeable layoffs this year. Since the year began there have been 60,000 job cuts across 254 tech companies.

Advertisement

Why Such Big Layoffs?

The layoffs at large companies, despite some having successful performance metrics have some wondering why they are happening.

An artist representative of AI

Source: Steve Johnson/Unsplash

There are many theories that attempt to explain the trend, but one seems to be the rise of AI, which can increasingly take over the work that would require a person or even a team of people to do it much less.

Advertisement

Dam Has Broken

There has also been a change in the perception of layoffs. Previously, layoffs were seen as something only failing companies did and were saved as a last resort.

A boat drives across the water behind a large dam

Source: Wikipedia Commons

But now that so many successful companies are leveraging layoffs for a profit strategy, it’s become much more normalized, giving companies the freedom to experiment with it without as much negative stigma.

Advertisement