Shoppers in California Blame Newsom as They Scramble to 99 Cents Only Stores Before Closures
This month, the beloved 99 Cents Only Stores announced a wave of closures across California, Nevada, Texas, and Arizona, totaling 371.
With 265 stores closing in California alone, the impact is substantial for communities that have depended on these outlets for budget-friendly finds.
A California Institution Says Goodbye
Since their establishment in 1982, 99 Cents Only Stores have become a fixture in California’s retail scene.
The closure of many original locations represents more than a business decision; it signifies a significant disruption for the locals. At the core of this impactful decision is the company’s headquarters in Commerce, California.
Economic Policies Under Fire
Following the store closures, customer frustration is mounting.
Rick Juarez, a loyal customer for more than two decades, expressed his discontent to the Los Angeles Times: “I blame [Gavin] Newsom. Too many taxes, too high the minimum wage. These companies just can’t compete, and so they have to close. And it’s poor people like us who end up suffering.”
More Than Just a Store to Many
For longtime patrons like Juarez, the Main Street store has been more than a shopping destination; it has been part of his routine for 20 years.
With the closures approaching, he is stocking up on essentials like batteries, aware that soon, such simple conveniences will be a thing of the past.
Clearance Sales Attract Crowds
News of the store closures has sparked a flurry of “everything must go” sales.
Fox News reports that crowds are converging in large numbers to take advantage of the final days at their cherished discount stores, searching for deals on a wide array of items.
The Necessity of Affordable Options
Altagracia Nuñez shared with the Los Angeles Times how the store played a crucial role in managing her family’s budget, allowing her to purchase everything from toys for her children to household groceries.
With the stores closing, many like her who are financially constrained face new challenges.
A Vital Resource for the Community
In his interview with the Los Angeles Times, delivery driver Victor Barrios relayed a widespread concern.
He said, “This needs to stay open. I make OK money, and buying here helps me. But imagine if you’re on WIC? If you’re on Social Security? You need a place like this. Are people now supposed to go to Ralphs? Or Target? With what money?”
CEO Addresses the Closures
Interim CEO Mike Simoncic addressed the closures, acknowledging, “This was an extremely difficult decision and is not the outcome we expected or hoped to achieve.”
He pointed out that evolving economic and retail challenges necessitated a comprehensive reevaluation of their strategy.
No Stone Left Unturned
The company dedicated months to exploring every conceivable alternative to stave off closures.
Despite exhaustive efforts, they found no viable solutions, leading to the strategic decision to orderly wind down operations to maximize asset value.
A Confluence of Challenges
Simoncic explained that the company faced numerous obstacles, including the severe impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, relentless inflation, and shifts in consumer preferences.
These challenges collectively have compromised the financial stability and operational capabilities of the stores.
A Specific Farewell
The Los Angeles Times reported that the Main Street location is scheduled to close in June, although a firm timeline for all locations remains unspecified.
This store is particularly significant as it has been a key shopping venue for the community for many years.
Looking Ahead Amid Uncertainty
With the impending closures of 99 Cents Only Stores, many consumers are left speculating about future shopping destinations for affordable items.
The disappearance of these stores indicates a significant shift in the retail landscape, compelling those who relied on them to reconsider their future shopping strategies.