Man Who Diverted a River to Ease Boat Access on Lake Michigan Convicted

Howard diverted the Platte River through Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore to ease boat access on Lake Michigan. The conviction follows a trial that shed light on Howard’s actions and their impact on the national park’s ecosystem.

He removed sediment and rocks from the river basin, constructing a makeshift dam with large rocks.

The alteration significantly widened the channel, providing unauthorized access for large boats to enter Platte Bay. After several days, the natural power of the water caused the makeshift channel to grow to be about 200 feet wide.

After creating the new channel, an influx of fishermen took advantage of the improved access conditions, leading to concerns about the ecological impact on Platte River.

One park ranger testified that “Howard dammed the river after being unable to navigate his boat into the bay that morning and later caught a coho salmon once the mouth was deepened.” Another presented receipts from a local hardware store showing Howard’s purchase of the shovel he used to dig the channel.

He was convicted and awaits sentencing, which could mean a maximum of six months in prison, a $5,000 fine, 5 years of probation, and mandatory restitution for diverting the Platte River. The charges underscore the seriousness of tampering with natural environments in federally protected areas.

The park ranger’s testimony highlighted the significant changes made by Howard, affecting both the river’s depth and the ease of access for large boats. While Howard had a policy dispute with the National Park Service (NPS), his actions were deemed unlawful and resulted in adverse effects on the environment.

This practice aimed to create an entry to the lake but faced criticism due to sediment deposition on the coast. The NPS had planned a $500,000 project to address this issue, but it is now on hold.

Lowering upstream water levels, the diversion addressed oversaturated marshland and erosion caused by high water levels. Additionally, it provided a solution to public safety concerns by allowing easier access for rescue boats in a popular area for kayakers and beachgoers.

U.S. District Attorney Mark Totten emphasized the prosecution as vital for safeguarding Michigan’s “natural treasures.” Totten criticized Howard for bypassing lawful means in his policy dispute with the National Park Service, resulting in substantial financial, ecological damage, and altering the landscape.

While Howard’s actions were deemed unlawful, the ecological consequences and public safety improvements resulting from the river diversion add complexity to the situation. It remains to be seen how this case will influence future decisions regarding river management in federally protected areas.

The case prompts reflection on the delicate balance between preserving ecosystems, ensuring public safety, and accommodating recreational activities in these protected areas.