“I was ‘told to say’ it was ‘a very inclusive process,'” he quipped, stirring speculation about how much of the process was genuine versus guided.

This significant boost placed Harris in a prominent spot, stirring both support and skepticism about the future of her presidential run.

Critics argue it sidestepped traditional democratic procedures, as she had yet to compete in any primary. This has ignited debates over whether her candidacy truly reflects the Democratic Party’s collective will.

“We went through a very open process, a very inclusive process,” he said, his tone dripping with irony as he alluded to being coached on what to say.

His laughter illustrated the surreal speed of the event, leaving many to wonder about the inner workings of such a quick decision.

This change in tone suggested a strategic alignment within the party amidst external controversies and internal challenges.

These assurances aim to calm the storm and affirm the party’s commitment to fairness.

Notably, journalist Glenn Greenwald lambasted the party on X, formerly Twitter, for what he viewed as a blatant disregard for democratic principles.

The widespread reaction points to a significant gap between party leadership decisions and public expectations.

This deviation from norm has sparked intense discussions about the future of democratic processes within the party.

However, he quickly threw his support behind Harris following Biden’s announcement, showcasing his pivotal role in this political saga.

This marks a significant milestone in her journey, framed by Newsom’s robust endorsement of her capabilities as ‘Tough. Fearless. Tenacious.’