“Frivolous” Lawsuit By Elon Musk Over X “Boycott” Slammed By Former FTC Official

By: David Donovan | Published: Aug 12, 2024

At the point when Elon Musk previously bought and took over Twitter, making the new X Corp, he quickly started fighting with advertisers who expressed their desire to pull their content from the evolving platform. 

Presently, the EV and spaceship entrepreneur and billionaire has filed a claim to mitigate the financial loss from the pulled ads.

Financial Losses

Musk started off by shooing away corporate sponsors with some less-than-polite language. 

Advertisement
Musk examining F9R Dev1 debris in 2014

Flickr user Steve Jurvetson

However, it appears that Musk’s business has suffered financial losses, and he is now attempting to recover them through what is being referred to as a “frivolous” lawsuit.

Advertisement

Musk’s Lawsuit

Ex-advertisers are alleged in Musk’s lawsuit to have abruptly withdrawn financial backing and placed advertisements that resulted in revenue losses for the site and parent company.

Advertisement
Musk next to a Tesla Model S, 2011

Flickr user Maurizio Pesce

This week, Musk’s rage has taken aim at a number of groups. The suit names companies such as Mars and CVS Health, as well as a global advertising alliance.

Changes Following Takeover

Advertisers were quick to criticize the changes to user agreements during Musk’s initial takeover of Twitter, including expanded options to purchase a blue checkmark account and less restrictive freedoms of speech.

Advertisement
Musk standing before a Model X at the 2014 Tesla Inc. annual shareholder meeting

Source: Steve Jurvetson/Flickr

When Musk was being interviewed less than a year ago at a business conference, he decided at the time to tell the advertisers to “Go [frick] yourself.”

Open Letter

An X CEO Linda Yaccarino provided X users and advertisers with an open letter and a video explaining why the lawsuit was filed.

Advertisement
Linda Yaccarino speaking into a microphone with another women outdoors

X user lindayaX

She asserts that X is accusing the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) of organizing an “illegal boycott” of X and different organizations. 

Musk’s Takeover

GARM attempts to lessen the monetization of harmful or illegal online content.

Musk discussing a Neuralink device during a live demonstration in 2020

Flickr user Steve Jurvetson

Since Musk’s major takeover and official change to calling the platform X, the site has seen a whirlwind of new content.

Advertisement

Decrease in Censure

In the early days of Musk’s ownership of the social media company, the decrease in censure that he was so fond of ensured that disturbing new information, slurs, and photos were shared on the site. 

Musk during the 2018 inauguration of the Boring Test Tunnel in Hawthorne, California

Flickr user Steve Jurvetson

Presently, it’s not difficult to come across election misinformation and explicit content while browsing on X.

Advertisement

Rumble Issues

A comparable issue happened with the social media site Rumble.

Five people on a couch with Rumble branding speaking into microphones

X user rumblevideo

Rumble is a video streaming site that turned into the new most loved spot for extreme right-wing conspiracy theorists to share their thoughts, hate speech, and misinformation.

Advertisement

Joining the Lawsuit

In order to keep some of its previous advertisers Rumble recently announced that it would join X in the lawsuit.

Three people outdoors speaking into microphones with a camera pointed at them

X user rumblevideo

Their advertisers include Unilever, CVS Health, Mars, and Ørsted, a Danish energy company.

Advertisement

“Now it is War”

As posted on X, Musk made a grand statement expressing, “We tried peace for 2 years, now it is war,” while sharing Yaccarino’s remarks on the lawsuit plans.

Musk giving a speech to SpaceX employees in 2012

Bill Ingalls

He likewise shared, “Everyone who has been boycotted should file a lawsuit in every country they’ve been boycotted,” in light of Rumble joining the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Corporate Sponsors Pull Out

Several major corporate sponsors removed their content from the website when Musk first took over, citing the proliferation of new right-wing extremist content.

Vice President Mike Pence and Mrs. Karen Pence arrive at Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout Facility in Merritt Island, Fla. Wednesday, May 27, 2020, and are greeted by Jim Bridenstine, NASA Administrator. Elon Musk, Founder and CEO.

Flickr user The White House

He sought to take swift legal action against watchdog groups that observed the toxic climate on the web. One especially frivolous claim took aim at the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which had a lot of records on the recently renamed X platform.

Advertisement

FTC Perspective

The case was thrown out in March, and the judge stated that Musk couldn’t punish groups for participating in free speech by pulling their support.

Apex Building, built in 1938 (FTC headquarters) in Washington, DC

Wikimedia Commons user Harrison Keely

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) does utilize antitrust regulations that can implement unlawful boycotting from large gatherings. This is precisely what the X Corp legal advisors are claiming is being done to them.

However, the organization notes: “A business can always unilaterally choose its business partners.” In specific cases, the FTC can mediate in circumstances where huge organizations or an assortment of organizations conspire to hurt competition.

Advertisement